Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:05:09 -0400 From: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com> To: Will Andrews <will@firepipe.net> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Hiroki Sato <hrs@freebsd.org>, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CFR: FIB handling improvements Message-ID: <CAOFF%2BZ0Sm=Ewb_Qn9gzu=rdpadSf%2BmAv-RfZ6chSj5-6ca0WaQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADBaqmi4gEG_yAfibKPY2=GgJoqqZOVbos77iSFh0gKt990q6g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADBaqmi6c7v8ojry8uViRi9tK18n8_RaDrP%2BUjvcmEN9guWm3w@mail.gmail.com> <20130822.032022.481255110184207810.hrs@allbsd.org> <CADBaqmi4gEG_yAfibKPY2=GgJoqqZOVbos77iSFh0gKt990q6g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Will Andrews <will@firepipe.net> wrote: > > Other places in rc.d/routing can make use of 'all' in that case. > > No, loopback host routes are not installed into all FIBs, only FIB 0. > This is with rt_add_addr_allfibs == 0 (see rtinit1()), which probably > explains why. We could add an override for lo0 addresses, but perhaps > this is something that should be configurable? i.e. allow the > administrator to specify in rc.conf which FIBs lo0's host route should > be placed on? > > Will, you have my wheels turning, configurable tuning for lo0's host route. This would defiantly be a interesting feature. -- Sam Fourman Jr.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOFF%2BZ0Sm=Ewb_Qn9gzu=rdpadSf%2BmAv-RfZ6chSj5-6ca0WaQ>