Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:38:50 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca> To: dick hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using HDD's for ZFS: 'desktop' vs 'raid / enterprise' -edition drives? Message-ID: <495EB39A.9060304@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <495EB07C.9000401@ibctech.ca> References: <495E17AD.30707@isafeelin.org> <20090102160727.A38841@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <867i5dsoll.fsf@srvbsdnanssv.interne.kisoft-services.com> <20090102174809.B39293@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090102201730.GC22308@teddy.fas.com> <20090102222428.e06eddac.dick@nagual.nl> <495EB07C.9000401@ibctech.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Bertrand wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:17:30 -0500 >> stan <stanb@panix.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:48:27PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>>>>> think twice before doing. >>>>> Could you elaborate please ? >>>> ZFS still doesn't work as described ... >>> Is that comment FreeBSD specifc, or aimed at ZFS in general? >> Mind you, ZFS on FreeBSD is not the same as on OpenSolaris-2008.11, >> Nevada or even Solaris 10. On those platforms ZFS generally does what it >> is supposed to do, other than it's still a developing FS. >> On *BSD related systems that is not always the case. Do a good readup. > > I had problems with ZFS about a year ago (or so). > > Since then, for me, ZFS has been quite reliable: I forgot to mention... the "Since then" should have also included that at the time of unreliability, I was testing a new NVidia motherboard. "Since then, I've swapped out the board to an Intel hardware platform". Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?495EB39A.9060304>