Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:01:25 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: g.cecchetti@sssup.it Cc: Fabio Checconi <fabio@retis.sssup.it>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panics and freeze using age0 Message-ID: <20081107090125.GG11486@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <4913EF93.6010006@sssup.it> References: <49133B35.9040603@sssup.it> <20081107072201.GD11486@cdnetworks.co.kr> <4913EF93.6010006@sssup.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:34:43PM -0800, Gabriele Cecchetti wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon ha scritto: > [...] > > >Would you be more elaborate on this issue? Does it mean you have > >to manually up/down game with ifconfig(8) after boot? > > Yes, I need to do that. > Sometimes happen that even if the interface > is showed during the bootlog, then it is not showed by ifconfig. > Typing ifconfig again show the interface. > Then I've to down/up the interface and/or ping outside, like the > interface was sleeping. > Would you show me dmesg output? > > > Anyone with similar experience ? > > > age0 driver is well tested for production enviroment or not ? > > > [...] > > > Is better to buy another Intel card and going on using em0 driver ? > > > >Remember, all hardwares supported by age(4) are for consumer > >motherboards. Even if L1 has much better performance/design than > >that of its successor, L1E, it's still not for server market. > >The same is true for em(4). Since there are too many variants you > >may have to choose the best hardware model that is suited for your > >workload. > The other card I'm using is: > em0@pci0:5:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'PRO/1000 GT' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > So, which card is the best buy for the server market ? Maybe other users in this list can answer that. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081107090125.GG11486>