Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:28:07 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pointyhat is building for 5.5 but claiming 8.0 Message-ID: <4783F8F7.8080107@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <29401398@bb.ipt.ru> References: <61565506@bb.ipt.ru> <4783E1C6.50001@FreeBSD.org> <95483459@bb.ipt.ru> <1199830245.74596.155.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <29401398@bb.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 00:45 +0300: > >>>> No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot >>>> be wrapped. >>> Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get >>> an error for this port. > >> The FreeBSD version inside the tinderbox is same as the host? > > No, the versions are different. > >>>> This is common in the python world. It needs to use >>>> uname(1) or uname(3) or OSVERSION. >>> The port itself (at the Makefile) uses "uname -r". There is something >>> weird though. > >> Not specific to this port - this is an issue with easydistutils or >> whatsthename of that thing that does eggs. > > But not all of python ports with eggs does not build at pointyhat. > Err, I mean very few python ports with eggs get errors... They have often been the cause of failure but someone apparently knows how to fix them :) Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4783F8F7.8080107>