Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:38:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c) Message-ID: <20000425233809.C1022@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252235470.331-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from chuckr@picnic.mat.net on Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 10:40:23PM -0400 References: <20000426102521.C38026@freebie.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252235470.331-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 10:40:23PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > If you want, I'd do this myself this weekend. I don't think the makefile > part is all that difficult. At BSDcon we agreed that (1) the modules need to be built in a subdir of the kernel build dir; (2) they should be installed somewhere where their name matches the kernel name [/modules-kernel, /modules-kernel.old] for instance. The machanism for finding modules files was never fully flushed out. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000425233809.C1022>