Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:54:57 +0300 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> Cc: zaxis <z_axis@163.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's the difference between portupgrade and portmaster ? Message-ID: <AANLkTimKCkn_zIl75hqUc1EtLKZg0lXJOR2TyPiQF0r7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilWlt-ySQqMGfqhW0Hoq2AAgLFJy3kcF3FI6to6@mail.gmail.com> References: <28736514.post@talk.nabble.com> <AANLkTimcHZOLz7AvkVil29W4qbjb9oGTDAs3IE5ygQgm@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTilWlt-ySQqMGfqhW0Hoq2AAgLFJy3kcF3FI6to6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:46 AM, David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/6/1 Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>: >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, zaxis <z_axis@163.com> wrote: >>> >>> Why do we need two tools ? >>> >> Its three. Add portmanager. >> >> The answer is personal choice and we number of bikesheds. >> >> Also portmaster used to not be able to work with packages when >> portupgrade could. >> > > portmaster can! See portmaster manpage. -P[P] options. > Also portmaster ****used to**** not be able to work with packages when portupgrade could. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimKCkn_zIl75hqUc1EtLKZg0lXJOR2TyPiQF0r7>