Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:37:41 -0800 From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> To: "Jason E. Hale" <jhale@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/173339: graphics/ImageMagick Port tries to build the universe Message-ID: <5096D215.3040401@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: <21464979.ul7sfrYTA6@mocha.verizon.net> References: <201211032200.qA3M013K012554@freefall.freebsd.org> <21464979.ul7sfrYTA6@mocha.verizon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/4/12 12:00 AM, Jason E. Hale wrote: > On Saturday, November 03, 2012 22:00:01 Josh Berkus wrote: >> Right, but my point is that the default dependancy is brain-dead. I'm >> trying to improve Ports so that it "does the right thing" out of the >> box, instead of the wrong thing. > > Most ports build with X11 support on by default. The "right thing" isn't > right for everyone, but that is why there are KNOBS and OPTIONS. Saying how > much it sucks or how brain-dead it is isn't improving anything. The > infastructure is already there to build without X11. If you don't want X11 > support all you have to do is define WITHOUT_X11=yes and OPTIONS_UNSET=X11 in > /etc/make.conf. It's that simple. Hmmm, I actually had WITHOUT_X11=yes in the configuration file, but it built with X11 anyway. I didn't have OPTIONS_UNSET=X11. Is that the expected behavior? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5096D215.3040401>