Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:23:33 -0800 (PST) From: Dave Wells <wellsian@caffeine.com> To: James Wyatt <jwyatt@rwsystems.net> Cc: Gene Harris <zeus@tetronsoftware.com>, "David A. Gobeille" <dgobe@mcs.net>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DSL firewall and DNS Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002121519330.16572-100000@boris.netgate.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10002121715350.42549-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Great. Thanks to James and Leif for clearing this up. On my way to pick up the bind book. :) Thanks again. TA, Dave On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, James Wyatt wrote: > Subject: Re: DSL firewall and DNS > > You aren't misrepresenting anything... You are listing the server folks > should use most often (primary choice, not DNS master) and what to fall > back on if it's too slow (dead = really too slow). Think of it as three > nameservers, the most reachable two of which are listed. Now if someone > asks you under oath who is master and slave, you should be careful - Jy@ > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, wellsian wrote: > > This is exactly what I've wanted to do for a couple installations, but I > > haven't felt secure about misrepresenting the primary/secondary > > relationship. Are there any technical reasons not to do what James > > suggests? k To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0002121519330.16572-100000>