Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:07:11 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: "Walter C. Pelissero" <walter@pelissero.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acu Cobol 6.0 for Linux Message-ID: <20040204020710.GD77596@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <16416.19009.687804.858168@hyde.home.loc> References: <16409.17392.62258.191839@hyde.home.loc> <200401291747.i0THlLL04725@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <16415.61145.783013.602178@hyde.home.loc> <20040203192031.GB77596@dan.emsphone.com> <16416.19009.687804.858168@hyde.home.loc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Feb 04), Walter C. Pelissero said: > A side note. What is the impact of this IPC_64 flag on the FreeBSD > code? Can we ignore it, or does it mean that the Linux emulator is > outdated regarding this "new" flag? Linux IPC_64 support was added to the 5.x tree over a year ago but never got merged back to 4.x. It looks like there are different structures for the IPC_64 case, so just stripping the IPC_64 bit won't work. Take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_ipc.c.diff?r1=1.30&r2=1.31&f=h - it was a mega-commit, so there's more than just the IPC_64 stuff, but it's pretty easy to pick out the right bits (basically anything with a 64 in it :). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040204020710.GD77596>