Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:45:33 -0500 From: David Rhodus <sdrhodus@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: In-kernel PPPoE Message-ID: <AANLkTik5-tAEJTfYOZqyLOjeUFVcU7M4%2BK9m_KU81o=C@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CFC2114.6040203@freebsd.org> References: <4CFBC86D.8090602@userid.org> <20101205173059.GG36574@cicely7.cicely.de> <4CFBF658.4060705@freebsd.org> <4CFC2114.6040203@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 05/12/2010 22:30 Julian Elischer said the following: >> On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote: >>>> Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported >>>> from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why? >>> Maybe because everyone who cares about in-kernel uses the FreeBSD >>> in-kernel ng_pppoe via mpd? >>> >>>> =A0From using it for a long time in OpenBSD I always found it quite st= able >>>> and easy to use. >>> The same is true with mpd/ng_pppoe. >> while I like mpd, I should point out that the regular 'in source' ppp th= at comes >> with >> freebsd also uses the in-kernel netgraph pppoe module. =A0 I use it 24 x= 7 on my >> gateway >> as I never got around to installing mpd and it "did the job". > > BTW, there is a rumor that mpd may become an 'in source' program too. > > > -- > Andriy Gapon Does mpd work in -current ? Last tried I, netgraph had problems with mpd.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTik5-tAEJTfYOZqyLOjeUFVcU7M4%2BK9m_KU81o=C>