Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:40:11 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/samba-devel Makefile ports/net/samba-devel/filespatch-ba Message-ID: <35586.992256011@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:35:57 %2B0300." <3B249F0D.AEB3C403@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:35:57 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Yes, but in this case *nothing* is changed in the behaviour of the > package, because bento knows nothing about WITH_CUPS option, therefore > packages built after the change will be exactly the same as ones built > before. Oh I see. So if I enable a feature that wasn't enabled before, or disable one that was, it's okay for me to bump PORTREVISION? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35586.992256011>