Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:51:04 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org>, embedded@freebsd.org, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org, Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/lib/csu Message-ID: <18371758-4A05-4C7B-AF7B-AD07AC9529F0@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <201309111049.51003.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <24478.1378868144@splode.eterna.com.au> <38D6DE4E-C4E3-4239-A198-51D6AC7711AC@bsdimp.com> <20130911092115.139716ce@bender.Home> <201309111049.51003.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 11, 2013, at 8:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:21:15 am Andrew Turner wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 21:12:51 -0600 >> Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>=20 >>> Perhaps we should do it too... I also like this elf-notes.html idea >>> too... >>=20 >> Something like the patch I've attached from the thread at [1]? It = adds >> a MACHINE_ARCH note type. >=20 > bapt@ will want this for pkgng. It might be nice to go whole hog and = store > the entire triple (MACHINE, MACHINE_ARCH, MACHINE_CPUARCH). MACHINE is just the kernel interface, might be only mildly useful to = pkgng. MACHINE_ARCH is useful since it uniquely defines the ABI we're using, by = definition. MACHINE_CPUARCH can be derived from MACHINE_ARCH and isn't actually = useful to pkgng at all. It is a build-time value to select which files = from our tree to build with. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18371758-4A05-4C7B-AF7B-AD07AC9529F0>