Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Aug 2000 02:08:56 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no>
To:        Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: rc.syscons ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10008040207210.41872-100000@login-1.eunet.no>
In-Reply-To: <20000803172130.L80822@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is there some reason we don't have an rc.syscons file?  Much of rc.i386
> and rc.alpha seems to be identical and it would seem appropriate to
> split that out into rc.syscons or something, both because it would
> be cleaner and would mean less chance of someone updating one and
> forgetting the other.

This sounds good to me; however, I'm getting somewhat concerned about the
growing number of seperate rc files in the top level of /etc... Might the
time be right to consider relocating these to a second level directory?

On a side note, has the issue of replacing the current rc script mechanism
been rehashed lately?

Marius



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10008040207210.41872-100000>