Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:55:04 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, arch@freebsd.org, kmacy@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base Message-ID: <86tyywklon.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86y6o8kmiv.fsf@ds4.des.no> ("Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rg?= =?utf-8?Q?rav=22's?= message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:36:56 %2B0200") References: <20090921210159.2D4D51CC37@ptavv.es.net> <86y6o8kmiv.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> writes:
> > 1. Should such a tool be in the base system?
> We already have window(1). It has a number of features that screen(1)
> and tmux(1) lack, but it can't detach.
> > 2. If so, should it be screen(1) or tmux(1)
> The former is GPL, the latter is BSD.
Don't construe this as a vote in favor of importing tmux, though. I use
screen pretty much everywhere, and I'm perfectly OK with installing it
from ports; it's just One Of Those Things that I always do on a new
machine, like installing zsh and copying over my zsh{env,rc}.
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86tyywklon.fsf>