Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 18:10:47 -0800 From: Patrick <gibblertron@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports of gem for Ruby 1.9 only Message-ID: <CA%2BdWbmYP%2BoADaQO3=MxqS-GKx0p9jpXLbtZBmFYwNK2oYrxvNQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJBULbXeKFZrSjv7qggeeX63W_dY6-w1fPGCSfO2usH6tZDtRQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJBULbWkPQ4T48tGVjVsMmgAU%2Bo9nO6w8BxVmB5ADiCSZwZhoA@mail.gmail.com> <1354736658.11551.6.camel@eva02> <CAJBULbXeKFZrSjv7qggeeX63W_dY6-w1fPGCSfO2usH6tZDtRQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I vote for a 1.9 default as well. This is now the default on our servers by way of /etc/make.conf, and we are using jails to support legacy 1.8.7 apps. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Hiroyuki Iwatsuki <don@na.rim.or.jp> wrote: > Thank you for your reply. > > > I think the best would be make 1.9 as default version, again ;). > > I agree with you. > > Hiroyuki Iwatsuki <don@na.rim.or.jp> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BdWbmYP%2BoADaQO3=MxqS-GKx0p9jpXLbtZBmFYwNK2oYrxvNQ>