Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 09:53:44 -0400 From: "Frank J. Laszlo" <laszlof@freebsd.org> To: Sean McAfee <smcafee@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Vladimir Ermakov <samflanker@gmail.com> Subject: Re: New port: sysutils/megacli waiting to commit Message-ID: <4A140B68.4030800@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4A1406FB.7020502@collaborativefusion.com> References: <4A13AB59.9060002@gmail.com> <4A13C3E6.20209@p6m7g8.com> <4A13F48D.9040009@freebsd.org> <4A1406FB.7020502@collaborativefusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sean McAfee wrote: > Frank J. Laszlo wrote: >> Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >>> Vladimir Ermakov wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, all. >>>> please appreciate my port *megacli* >>>> >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 >>>> >>> >>> Is that different from this the port, is it an update? >>> >>> Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli >>> >>> >> >> Since the megacli application now has a native binary, should be not >> DEPRICATE the linux version? >> >> Regards, >> Frank Laszlo > > Probably not. I noted this when I originally filed the PR for > linux-megacli2, but the 1.x, 2.x, and 4.x versions support > dramatically different hardware lines. > > As an example, this native version is 4.x and does not support the > Dell PERC5. > > IMO, linux-megacli, linux-megacli2, and megacli should all exist as > independent ports. > Sorry, I missed this reply with your reasoning. Thanks for clearing that up. Regards, Frank Laszlo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A140B68.4030800>