Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:02:01 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tables in ipfw2 Message-ID: <20040624150201.GA66542@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040624075007.A66175@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20040624004039.A62893@xorpc.icir.org> <200406240929.i5O9TDBD000460@ns.networkersbg.com> <20040624103716.GA64935@ip.net.ua> <20040624120725.GA84753@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> <20040624075007.A66175@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:50:07AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:07:25PM +0200, Pawel Malachowski wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:37:16PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >=20 > > Hello, > >=20 > > > > So you mean that it is only in 5.x branch. > > > > Is there a patch for 4.10 RELENG ? > > > >=20 > > > No, it's just not getting built by default in 4.x. > > > In 4.x, you need IPFW2=3DYES in /etc/make.conf, and > > > possibly ``options IPFW2'' instead of ``options > > > IPFIREWALL'' in your kernel config file. >=20 > it is "in addition to", not "instead of" >=20 I have it "instead of" in my kernel configs, and nothing appears to be broken. I mean, no code checks for the IPFIREWALL #define, and otherwise compiling empty ip_fw.o (when both IPFIREWALL and IPFW2 are defined) into the kernel seems pointless to me. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2uzpqRfpzJluFF4RAuqmAJ9vKu31fqgA0m1VarL0gkD3OCPRZQCgkCMs yn1stvBl7it0HsEK4/5y8rs= =q346 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040624150201.GA66542>