Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:41:51 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Andrew Milton <akm@theinternet.com.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cynchronised sleep capbilty.. Message-ID: <20050201103824.X572@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050201183552.GA48100@camelot.theinternet.com.au> References: <20050201101113.J572@localhost> <20050201183552.GA48100@camelot.theinternet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Andrew Milton wrote: > +-------[ Julian Elischer ]---------------------- > | > > > | This doesn't matter too much except that I now need to do > | the same on 50 machines and I need the data to line up. > > [snip] > > | firstly: does anyone know a better way to do this? > > look at clusterit.. > > http://www.garbled.net/clusterit.html > > it has as one of it's features; > > Barrier sync for shell scripting. > This is a new idea. The barrier mechanism consists of a daemon run on a > host, and a client which can be used to barrier sync with. > > Not sure if it's suitable for what you want. "sorta" but a bit heavyweight for what I'm looking for.. also doesn't give the simple accurate X second period I'm looking for for simple shellscripts without adding the server daemon. a good find though.. I may have some other uses for it :-) julian > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050201103824.X572>