Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:16:09 -0400 From: Joshua Lee <yid@softhome.net> To: "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why did evolution fail? Message-ID: <20020909231609.68ac5883.yid@softhome.net> In-Reply-To: <20020906181354.C44831-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan> References: <20020907002242.GC15779@hades.hell.gr> <20020906181354.C44831-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:30:52 -0700 (PDT) "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> wrote: > Correction. Logic and ethics are meaningless without objective > standards, and objective standards are impossible without appealing > to something, well, *objective*. "Objective" means that it comes to > you from the outside, externally, i.e. "not subjective". So No, "objective" can operate according to natural law without having to appeal to an external source. e.g. Kantian ethics. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020909231609.68ac5883.yid>