Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 08:29:57 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: some woes about rc.conf.site Message-ID: <11940.918404997@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Feb 1999 17:05:42 %2B0100." <19990207170542.A90515@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Sorry to say this, but after having to use rc.conf.site as it is now > I really kind of 'hate' it. Sorry to say this, but you really don't understand it. :) > When we had one central rc.conf file it was fun to browse through > it and having all supported knobs visible at a glance. And you still have this now. In fact, with the unadulterated rc.conf, you have the original "default" values for youre reference. > Then rc.conf.site has a totally different sort order which is > not very helpful/comfortable, when comparing rc.conf and rc.conf.site. Well now that much is true - I suppose I could sort it, or something. > Then rc.conf.site doesn't contain every knob which rc.conf has. Erm, it's not supposed to. It's supposed to contain only those knobs you want to change. Are we even talking about a 3.0/4.0 snapshot made after 99/2/5 23:00 PST? I did send email out about this. > Well, maybe I overlooked some things advantages ;-) Then please tell me. As usual, I think you're just out of date and we're not even talking about current technology. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11940.918404997>