Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:57:28 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 cpu_switch.S machdep.c 
Message-ID:  <69576.1129658248@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:50:37 PDT." <435527DD.3040007@root.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <435527DD.3040007@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes:


>I have good information that in the near future, most designs will have 
>guaranteed synchronized TSC across all CPUs.

...and when those chips arrive, we can hopefully identify them by some
bit in some MSR and then we can use the TSC on them.

This is a good move and it is only too bad that it's taken the chip
manufacturers 10 years to figure this out.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69576.1129658248>