Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:50:01 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pointyhat is building for 5.5 but claiming 8.0 Message-ID: <47840C29.9030304@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <31152339@bb.ipt.ru> References: <61565506@bb.ipt.ru> <4783E1C6.50001@FreeBSD.org> <95483459@bb.ipt.ru> <1199830245.74596.155.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <63313519@bb.ipt.ru> <1199834453.74596.157.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <4784072D.9040003@FreeBSD.org> <31152339@bb.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Pav Lucistnik wrote: >>> Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300: >>>> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot >>>>>>> be wrapped. >>>>>> Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get >>>>>> an error for this port. >>>>> The FreeBSD version inside the tinderbox is same as the host? >>>> OK, I found the difference. The port builds for all FreeBSD version >>>> except 5.x. The same is for ports-mgmt/tinderbox. Thus I think that >>>> there is something that was not MFS'd to 5-STABLE that causes the >>>> difference. >>>> >>>> For now I'm going to mark the port as IGNORE for OSVERSION < 600000. >>>> A question to portmgr@: Do you have any objections? >>> It would be nice to know what exactly is going on in there. > >> Yeah, I can't imagine what it would be, unless it is using uname(1) or >> (3) and 5.x doesn't have the environment variable overrides...but in >> that case hundreds of other things would break. > > The port is using "uname -r" at the Makefile: > ----- > OSRELEASE!= /usr/bin/uname -r > ----- > > > WBR Yes, but that alone should be fine unless the above. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47840C29.9030304>