Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 20:14:33 -0500 From: Bakul Shah <bakul@torrentnet.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: G++ calling conventions Message-ID: <199702160114.UAA00533@chai.plexuscom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 15 Feb 1997 13:52:50 MST." <199702152052.NAA03985@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Does anyone know if gcc and/or g++ support the __stdcall type > designator? Yes (according to info gcc). > PS: What would be the chances of supporting the "interface" keyword > as an alias for "struct" in a future release? This can be done > in a FreeBSD-specific way using the g++ config data files (I think). If you think this keyword has value, why don't you suggest it to the gcc people? Adding it just to freebsd guarantees yet another #ifdef (if you write portable code using it). Though, IMHO, adding the `interface' keyword is not likely to make your code any more readable -- C++ is just too gross. Check out Beta for an example of a consistent and powerful O-O language.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702160114.UAA00533>