Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:18:52 -0800 From: George Hartzell <hartzell@kestrel.alerce.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPSEC btwn stable and Linksys BEFVP41 stopped working. Message-ID: <16397.39740.745527.827490@rosebud.alerce.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0401202015560.94399@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <16388.28960.595527.20394@rosebud.alerce.com> <16397.30413.488274.236361@rosebud.alerce.com> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0401202015560.94399@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bjoern A. Zeeb writes: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, George Hartzell wrote: > > > I have a bit more information, and a quick question. > > > > I set up a 5.2 Release system, > > known to be buggy for IPSEC (not for FAST_IPSEC): > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-January/thread.html#18084 Would this also bother a 4.9 system? > > > with a current copy of the racoon port, > > Do you have 20040116a ? > > 20040114a is known to have endian bugs I think: > http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/350025/2004-01-14/2004-01-20/0 I'll check evening. The -stable system is still using racoon-20030711a_1, which is the port that's been working fine up until what-ever happened. g.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16397.39740.745527.827490>