Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:58:56 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl Message-ID: <20040920215856.GA21033@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040920211839.GA15066@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200409201934.i8KJYfcS036447@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040921.054126.07648742.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20040920211839.GA15066@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 09:18:39PM +0000, David O'Brien wrote.. > On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 05:41:26AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > > "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> wrote > > obrien> Log: > > obrien> Use consistent wording. > .. > > - x86 compatible, AMD64 and Intel EM64T, Alpha, IA-64, PC-98 > > + x86 compatible, AMD64 compatible, Alpha, IA-64, PC-98 > .. > > I would like to make it clear that FreeBSD supports EM64T > > by using the Intel's architecture name because the word > > AMD64 can confuse the users. Is that unacceptable? > > If I can list AMD Athlon, AMD K6, AMD K5, VIA, Cyrix, Transmeta, National > Semiconductor, IBM, etc... in the list rather than "x86 compatible". For > Alpha we would need to add Samsung, who also made some Alpha dirivitives. Alpha/AXP to be politically correct. Alpha never made it as a TM, hence the AXP. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040920215856.GA21033>