Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:01:14 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raidframe Message-ID: <20030602070114.GC2605@kevad.internal> In-Reply-To: <03dc01c32902$f09bc680$812a40c1@PETEX31> References: <3ED9E8AB.5060106@he.iki.fi> <20030601232426.A43338@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <00b501c32876$74502fd0$812a40c1@PETEX31> <3EDA600C.90104@btc.adaptec.com> <039101c328e2$09bce480$812a40c1@PETEX31> <20030602050917.GB2247@kevad.internal> <03dc01c32902$f09bc680$812a40c1@PETEX31>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:31:49PM +0300, Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> wrote: > > FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to > > production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste > > your time. > > This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyone. > > IMO, software does not magically get better but it must be actively > being used and problems reported and fixed in reasonable time. > > So if 5.x never gets users it never gets production quality. As do I, but I initially thought you needed stable platform. I vaguely remember your mails about some network related things etc. which seemed to indicate such need. I've sent you personal reply. Sorry. -- Vallo Kallaste
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030602070114.GC2605>