Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:41:17 +0000 From: "Igor Mozolevsky" <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> To: "Robert Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sbrk(2) broken Message-ID: <a2b6592c0801040241l598ea9b7h57ad6889a1eccd3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080104002002.L30578@fledge.watson.org> References: <477C82F0.5060809@freebsd.org> <863ateemw2.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080104002002.L30578@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/01/2008, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote: > To be clear, in the new world order, instead of getting NULL > back from malloc(3), SIGKILL is delivered to large processes. Huh??? Again, huh???
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a2b6592c0801040241l598ea9b7h57ad6889a1eccd3>