Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:21:37 +1030
From:      Malcolm Kay <malcolm.kay@internode.on.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, rob1940@gmail.com
Subject:   Re: WD External Disc Drive
Message-ID:  <200910271621.37761.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net>
In-Reply-To: <200910271527.23227.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net>
References:  <aab0909a0910251718q4dc26baeu7c0a452add98d783@mail.gmail.com> <20091026110905.f802174a.freebsd@edvax.de> <200910271527.23227.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:27 pm, Malcolm Kay wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:39 pm, Polytropon wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > just a little terminology note (from me, Mister
> > Use-the-correct-words): If you are refering to a kind of
> > hard disk, use "disk" with k. Think like "diskette". If you
> > are refering to optical media, use "disc" with c. Think like
> > "CD = compact disc".
>
> An arbitrary convention adopted by you and a few other people
> does not invalidate the dictionary spellings and usage.
>
> My Australian (Macquarie) dictionary gives the spelling in all
> cases as "disc" but recognises "disk" as a chiefly US variant.
> My Conscise Oxford (English) dictionary simply gives the two
> spellings as alternatives but states that "disk" is the
> better. My Webster's (American) gives the two forms as
> alternatives without suggesting any preference. Of course
> different editions of the dictionaries may give slightly
> different slants but are most unlikely to actually contradict
> these possibly earlier views.
>
> > Disk: disk pack, hard disk, disk drive
> > Disc: optical disc, magneto-optical disc, disc drive
> >
> > In your special case, you can even say that your external
> > hard disk shows up as a disc in "Windows". It's correct.
> >
> > I know it may sound impolite (but it is not meant to be),
> > but using the correct terminology is very important if you
> > want to be understood correctly.
>
> I find your distinctions arbitrary and quite inappropriate;
> again not meaning to sound impolite. So, each to his/her own
> usage but please do not be critical of those of us not
> conforming to your arbirary conventions.
>
Further,

If we look at some acronyms associated with optical media we 
have:
CD -> Compact Disc
DVD -> Digital Video Disc
but:
UDF -> Universal Disk Format (The file system frequently used on 
CDs and DVDs)
So there is no consistency here!

Malcolm




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200910271621.37761.malcolm.kay>