Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 08:28:16 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: mike@smith.net.au, nate@mt.sri.com, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, luoqi@watermarkgroup.com Subject: Re: Stuff in /sbin and /usr/sbin (was Re: full path of sysctl in bsd.port.mk? ) Message-ID: <199812021528.IAA05690@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199812021523.CAA17703@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199812021523.CAA17703@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> It is generally useful; witness the context of the discussion. > > > >No, it's not. Just because we've hammered it into submission doesn't > >make it any more generically useful. Sysctl is a FreeBSD-only utility, > >and as such can not be counted on to do anything useful in anything but > >FreeBSD. As such, users should not be expected to know what it does, > > sysctl is a 4.4BSD utility. Sure, but FreeBSD is the only one who has all these 'special/new' MIB's that Mike thinks should be used by normal users for determining regular information (vs. using it for system configuration). In other words, using it for FreeBSD system configuration is acceptable, but expecting people to know how to use it and which MIB's to look at is a FreeBSD-only addition. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812021528.IAA05690>