Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:59:13 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: Georges-Andre Silber <silber@cri.ensmp.fr> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc: bug or feature ? Message-ID: <20040407125913.GB75228@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040407125532.GA75228@stack.nl> References: <4073F699.6010402@cri.ensmp.fr> <20040407125532.GA75228@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:55:32PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:39:53PM +0200, Georges-Andre Silber wrote: > > Is it a 'normal' behaviour of malloc()? Shouldn't malloc() return NULL? > > It should return NULL indeed. I can reproduce this on my -CURRENT > machine, while 5.2.1-RELEASE is ok. Erhm to be more precise: a 32-bit 5.2.1-RELEASE binary runs ok on both i386 and amd64 -CURRENT, but a 64-bit -CURRENT binary doesn't. Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040407125913.GB75228>