Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:      David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: misc/30297: CLOCKS_PER_SEC non-standard
Message-ID:  <200109041840.f84Ie2m12246@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR misc/30297; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Bernd Luevelsmeyer <bdluevel@heitec.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: misc/30297: CLOCKS_PER_SEC non-standard
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:33:04 +0100

 On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 03:29:39PM -0700, Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote:
 > >Description:
 > CLOCKS_PER_SEC in the #include-file <time.h> is 128.
 > "The Single UNIX Specification" at
 > http://www.UNIX-systems.org/online.html however says
 > "CLOCKS_PER_SEC is defined to be one million in <time.h>", and
 > the Red Hat Linux 7.2 manpage says "POSIX requires
 > that CLOCKS_PER_SEC equals 1000000 independent of the actual
 > resolution."
 > >How-To-Repeat:
 > 
 > >Fix:
 > If POSIX indeed requires CLOCKS_PER_SEC to be one million then
 > it should be changed to that value, in order to enhance
 > Standard conformance.
 
 This cannot be changed without either a library version number bump
 or introducing binary incompatability. Some people also reily on
 code using CLOCKS_PER_SEC producing sensible values.
 
 	David.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109041840.f84Ie2m12246>