Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:07:43 -0500
From:      "Glen Barber" <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>
To:        "Ramesh Ayyagari" <rameshayyagari@yahoo.com>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What would be the appropriate value for kern.maxfiles
Message-ID:  <4ad871310811191307s1a87825ekf5557f347792e30@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <974618.15901.qm@web111109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References:  <436595.20263.qm@web111109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4ad871310811181843v14e57474t8441b465dcb1ec99@mail.gmail.com> <974618.15901.qm@web111109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Ramesh Ayyagari
<rameshayyagari@yahoo.com> wrote:
> my server primarily runs postfix experiencing very huge inflow of mails
>>60000 per hour. There are some other services that the servers runs like
> caching DNS etc but postfix being the primary application running on it.
>
> Ram
>

1.) Please don't top-post.

2.) I gave you an example.  You obviously know what your server is
doing, so you need to adjust the tunable accordingly.  You can always
set the number "too high", then slim it down from there after testing
to see what meets your requirements.

-- 
Glen Barber


"If you have any trouble sounding condescending, find a Unix user to
show you how it's done."
 --Scott Adams



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ad871310811191307s1a87825ekf5557f347792e30>