Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 11:31:53 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Cc: angio@aros.net (Dave Andersen) Subject: Re: Congrats on CURRENT 5/1 SNAP... (fwd) Message-ID: <199605220931.LAA13569@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199605210844.CAA06949@terra.aros.net> from Dave Andersen at "May 21, 96 02:44:24 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Dave Andersen wrote:
> I'm not sure. What might be nice is nuking the sysinstall cruft from
> /stand, but keeping the statically linked binaries necessary for life,
j@uriah 109% ls -l /stand/sysinstall
-rwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 462848 Feb 25 1995 /stand/sysinstall*
^
...so it doesn't make much sense to remove (i.e., ``unlink'')
sysinstall. All you gain by it is a directory slot for /stand. :)
--
cheers, J"org
joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605220931.LAA13569>