Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 23:08:02 -0400 From: Ray Kohler <ray@rjk191.rh.psu.edu> To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_exec.c kern_exit.ckern_fork.c kern_proc.c kern_prot.c kern_resource.c uipc_socket.cuipc_socket2.c uipc_usrreq.c vfs_aio.c src/sys/sys proc.hresourcevar.h ucred.h Message-ID: <20000905230802.A1156@rjk191.rh.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: <39B5AB9D.63C8938C@netsynergy.co.uk>; from paul@netsynergy.co.uk on Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:27:41AM %2B0100 References: <200009052211.PAA70424@freefall.freebsd.org> <39B581FE.7E78128B@netsynergy.co.uk> <200009060222.TAA26628@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> <39B5AB9D.63C8938C@netsynergy.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:27:41AM +0100, Paul Richards wrote: > Don Lewis wrote: > > Maybe the -current version of GENERIC should enable INVARIANTS, for > > the same reason that we crank up malloc debugging. We should probably > > also have tuneable levels of sanity checking and have an easy way to > > tune the level at which each sanity check is activated without requiring > > a lot of change to the source. > > I have long advocated enabling INVARIANTS on the current branch. I enable INVARIANTS in every kernel I build, even -stable ones. The performance hit is so small and the sanity checking is so valuable I don't even give it a second thought. -- Ray Kohler <rjk191@psu.edu> FreeBSD -- The Power to Serve Paul's Law: In America, it's not how much an item costs, it's how much you save. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000905230802.A1156>