Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:46:56 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Vitaly Markitantov <vm@dics.com.ua>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: current vs stable performance compare? 
Message-ID:  <20936.1035294416@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:40:05 %2B0300." <20021022134005.GB31769@iron.del.local> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20021022134005.GB31769@iron.del.local>, Vitaly Markitantov writes:

>Where i can found performance comparison of -CURRENT over -STABLE systems?

Very little has been done yet, -CURRENT is not expected to perform 
particularly well until more of the kernel is out from under the
Giant lock.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20936.1035294416>