Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Jun 2002 10:54:15 +0200
From:      Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
To:        Christopher Nehren <apeiron@prophecy.dyndns.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: "Safe" to go to -CURRENT? 
Message-ID:  <1626.1023353655@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "05 Jun 2002 08:46:59 GMT." <1023266819.500.6.camel@prophecy.dyndns.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 05 Jun 2002 08:46:59 GMT, Christopher Nehren wrote:

> I've been monitoring the -CURRENT mailing list for about a day or two,
> and haven't seen anything that's really broken (except for GCC 3.x,
> which I don't use anyway). So, is it "safe" to upgrade to -CURRENT yet?
> TIA for the info,
> Chris

There are still issues with the C++ compiler in the base system that
make building X and some other C++ ports tricky.  If you use a lot of X
applications, you might want to hold back if you're looking for a smooth
ride.

The base system itself seems pretty stable, though.

Ciao,
Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1626.1023353655>