Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 May 2009 10:29:03 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: portmaster vs openoffice.org-3 (dmake)
Message-ID:  <4A143DDF.2030707@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A142F80.4000700@icyb.net.ua>
References:  <4A12F1EC.5030805@icyb.net.ua> <4A1366BE.9030700@FreeBSD.org> <4A13F09F.2050808@icyb.net.ua> <4A142F80.4000700@icyb.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/05/2009 14:59 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> In any case, it must be a bug in dmake code.
> 
> BTW, I can reliably reproduce this on amd64, but can not do it in i386 jail.
> Ports tree is exactly the same, ditto for portmaster version.

Ok, that sounds like a dmake memory bug on amd64. The stuff you pasted
from gdb is in fact portmaster stuff, and CUR_DEPS is an environment
variable that can grow quite large depending on what you're doing with
portmaster.


hth,

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A143DDF.2030707>