Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:07:29 -0700
From:      "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com>
To:        "Kip Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: moving sockbuf in to its own header
Message-ID:  <b1fa29170807201607v52f71cfekd96be0ca0a62fff4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c1674c90807201514o5bafba72r6be84de6e37a5525@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <3c1674c90807201514o5bafba72r6be84de6e37a5525@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Actually, I'd like to re-factor multiple parts of socketvar in to
separate files.

Please provide feedback on the following:

http://www.fsmware.com/socketvar_refactor.diff

Thanks,
Kip


On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> wrote:
> TOE drivers  need to be able to directly enqueue data in to a socket
> buffer and thus benefit from having knowledge of sockbuf internals.
> However, there is no need for them to know about other socket
> definitions. Thus I would like to move sockbuf and accompanying
> definitions to their own header.
>
> This is a fairly straightforward change so I don't really see the need
> to wait more than a few days for feedback:
>
> http://www.fsmware.com/sockbuf.h.diff
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170807201607v52f71cfekd96be0ca0a62fff4>