Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Apr 2000 13:26:47 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        andrew@ugh.net.au
Cc:        James Bishop <James.Bishop@trw.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NexGen Processor
Message-ID:  <20000424132646.E24816@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004250549580.68318-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>; from andrew@ugh.net.au on Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 05:50:36AM %2B1000
References:  <011401bfae23$93c605e0$3b248ccc@ymp.gov> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004250549580.68318-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* andrew@ugh.net.au <andrew@ugh.net.au> [000424 13:20] wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, James Bishop wrote:
> 
> > I have a NexGen processor. It is a 586 class pentium clone. Will FreeBSD run
> > on it?
> 
> If its a true clone then it will run fine.

Er, they may be some issues if FreeBSD doesn't recognize the processor
ID, however looking through the source it seems that we do support it:

i386/identcpu.c:        { "NexGen 586",         CPUCLASS_386 },         /* CPU_N

so things ought to be fine.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000424132646.E24816>