Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:47:08 +0100 From: Phil Brennan <phil.brennan@gmail.com> To: infofarmer@mail.ru Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About FreeBSD and Solaris Message-ID: <ff0f76e00503310547236a8b08@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <424B04CC.8060909@mail.ru> References: <20050326224344.4152110C83@relay2.beelinegprs.ru> <20050326233120.GA4611@gothmog.gr> <20050327124610.GA1609@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie> <ff0f76e00503270915280b6852@mail.gmail.com> <86oed2veqd.fsf@xps.des.no> <424B04CC.8060909@mail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 30, 2005 8:58 PM, Andrew P. <infofarmer@mail.ru> wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > Phil Brennan <phil.brennan@gmail.com> writes: > > > >>This mysql benchmark includes solaris 10 and freebsd 5.3. Its a month > >>or two old now, but its the only one I've seen. Dag-Erling, how does > >>this show solaris to be slow on x86? It certainly isn't slow compared > >>to freebsd. > > > > > > Please use something else than MySQL as benchmark, as MySQL has > > well-known issues with FreeBSD's threading model. > > > > DES >=20 > Latest talk on the Net suggests that freebsd is a > perfect choice for mysql-based database, but you > should compile it (mysql) with linux threads enabled. >=20 > I think Yahoo has used mysql on freebsd for years > on end. They have switched their core db units to > linux-oracle, though. >=20 > Andrew P. >=20 Could you provide urls for this latest talk?=20 >From the testing in that benchmark that I posted, kse threading seems to be as good as linuxthreads, but not enough to catch linux or solaris.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ff0f76e00503310547236a8b08>