Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:55:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: paul@aps.org Subject: ports/57101: [patch][non-maintainer] mark net/howl BROKEN for non-i386 Message-ID: <200309221755.h8MHtk1b011882@lonesome.lonesome.com> Resent-Message-ID: <200309221800.h8MI0axQ008402@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 57101 >Category: ports >Synopsis: [patch][non-maintainer] mark net/howl BROKEN for non-i386 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Sep 22 11:00:36 PDT 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Mark Linimon >Release: FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE i386 >Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services >Environment: System: FreeBSD lonesome.lonesome.com 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Sep 5 01:19:33 CDT 2003 linimon@lonesome.lonesome.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/MULTIMEDIA_DEBUG i386 >Description: Per bento, the configuration process seems to not be able to accept any architecture other than i386. The website seems to claim otherwise, however. I can't really makes heads or tails of the config.sub stuff so I'll have to leave that for someone more familiar with it. >How-To-Repeat: (bento logs) >Fix: Mark BROKEN as a workaround. --- howl/Makefile.dist Sun Aug 24 01:34:06 2003 +++ howl/Makefile Mon Sep 22 12:48:32 2003 @@ -17,4 +17,8 @@ USE_LIBTOOL= yes INSTALLS_SHLIB= yes +.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "i386" +BROKEN= "seems not to detect this architecture, although perhaps it should be able to" +.endif + .include <bsd.port.mk> >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309221755.h8MHtk1b011882>