Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 03:06:20 +0600 (NOVT) From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" <stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru> To: Eriq <eqe@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: duel's in freebsd Message-ID: <20030106025810.F55616-100000@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru> In-Reply-To: <200301051012.35751.eqe@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FreeBSD 5.0 will be better, but 4.7 is more stable. :-)
You need to balance between stability and power... I use -CURRENT on my
iPaq C700/256Mb RAM/10Gb/i815, and 4.7-STABLE on my Internet gateway
server, which is Compaq DeskPro C600/128Mb RAM/10Gb/i815. The -CURRENT
(scheduled for 5.0-RELEASE next week) is pretty stable now, but it was
terrible some time ago, especially before gcc-3.2.1 import... If you need
to run something important, then use 4.7-STABLE... I think that it'll be
better to wait for 5.1-RELEASE... But I plan to go to 5.0 after release on
my Internet gateway, because it's stability isn't so necessary... :-)
But our Radio-ethernet routers will stay -STABLE (sometimes even 3.3...
:-) )
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru
mailto:stranger@fpm.ami.nstu.ru
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Eriq wrote:
>which distro would be better 4.7 or 5.0 for duel cpu's.
>--
>
>Sign,
> Eriq Lamar
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030106025810.F55616-100000>