Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:24:53 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpthread_dbg Makefile pthread_dbg.cMakefile.inc src/lib/libpthread_dbg/arch/i386/i386 pthread_dbg_md.c Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402042016120.22525-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <4021973A.5070004@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, David Xu wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > >On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > >> > >>I'm sure the gdb(1) people are happy with our contribution :-) > >> > >>Seriously: We (=FreeBSD) provide 3 threading libraries (2 on ia64). > >>It's our problem. I'm fine with you bootstrapping libthread_db with > >>only the support for KSE, but eventually libthr needs to be added. > >> > >> > > > >I tend to agree. From the outside looking in, it would seem > >easy enough to allow all 3 thread libraries to be supported. > >I think once we have it working with libpthread, we can move > >stuff around inside the debug library and one more layer of > >abstraction so libthr/libc_r support could be added. > > > > > I will make libkse work with gdb, but won't do such work, because I > won't have so > much free time, I am busy at work due to job transfer. I wouldn't worry right now too much about adding libthr support. I can go in and add the extra layer of abstraction after you're done getting it to work for libpthread. -- Dan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10402042016120.22525-100000>