Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 20:59:59 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Jimbo Bahooli <moke@fools.ecpnet.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anoncvs server Message-ID: <199702250359.UAA19853@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <4685.856840962@time.cdrom.com> References: <199702250236.TAA19435@rocky.mt.sri.com> <4685.856840962@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I *certainly* don't speak for core, but anoncvs is a *huge* > > networking/CPU load, much more than CVSup and the CPU load is *much* > > higher than SUP (though the network load can be better than SUP). > > Well, I have a server I can run it on (and it's not on any of our > machines :-) so it's more a matter of waiting for CVS to DTRT. And that would be? Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702250359.UAA19853>