Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:14:05 -0500
From:      "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
To:        tamgya@gmail.com
Cc:        gnome@FreeBSD.org, marcus@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: upgrading NSPR to 4.8.2
Message-ID:  <4AF8861D.70407@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <87bpjgpdaa.fsf@mecuria.xbsd.name>
References:  <200911051608.nA5G8ax4067893@aldan.algebra.com> <87bpjgpdaa.fsf@mecuria.xbsd.name>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Denise H. G. ΞΑΠΙΣΑΧ(ΜΑ):
> Hi Mikhail
> 
> consider using send-pr or sending the problem report via the web
> interface, which is a more efficient way and will attract more
> attention.

I really do believe, that e-mailing the port-maintainer is the quickest
and the surest way of getting a port's issue addressed. Unless the
particular maintainer is absent, of course :-) in which case any
ports-committer (such as myself) can fix the problem themselves, after a
reasonable "maintainer timeout".

Even if I were to submit a PR (what's "web interface" anyway?), it would
just be assigned to ``gnome''... Why waste time and effort?

Joe, do you need more information, or is my update being tested on your
famous cluster already? I was hoping, this would be done over the weekend...

BTW, I sent our collection of little fixes to Mozilla -- maybe, we'll be
able to remove some of the hunks next time:

	https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527006

Thanks! Yours,

	-mi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AF8861D.70407>