Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:39:14 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mxe@aldan.algebra.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: While we discuss libtool (-fpic vs. -fPIC) Message-ID: <1141159154.20664.86.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com> In-Reply-To: <20060228201124.GA85491@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1141151381.20664.19.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com> <20060228192453.GA84695@xor.obsecurity.org> <1141155894.20664.59.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com> <20060228195014.GA85269@xor.obsecurity.org> <1141156556.20664.66.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com> <20060228201124.GA85491@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=F5 =D7=D4, 2006-02-28 =D5 15:11 -0500, Kris Kennaway =D0=C9=DB=C5:
> Where I said "-fPIC and not -fpic is correct on amd64 and ia64." On
> i386 they are equivalent. In fact now I'm not sure they're not
> equivalent on amd64 and ia64 too (in which case the current situation
> is still fine).
See also Chapter 2 ("Optimizations for DSOs) of
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
Yours,
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1141159154.20664.86.camel>