Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:22:59 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: "Expensive timeout(9) function" @an_stats_update() [/usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:724] Message-ID: <200210221422.g9MEMxwU006241@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Noticed a bunch of: > Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0170e40(0xc274c000) 0.001114387 from running (yesterday's) -CURRENT, so I thought I'd check against (yesterday's kernel.debug (before I replaced it with today's). Per "nm -lan kernel.debug", I see: c0170420 T an_attach /usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:377 c0170a60 t an_rxeof /usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:529 c0170da0 t an_txeof /usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:687 c0170e40 t an_stats_update /usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:724 c0170f60 T an_intr /usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:761 c01711f0 t an_cmd /usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:829 c0171420 t an_reset /usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:875 (I thought a bit of additional contect might be of use.) I do have some patches to the "an" driver installed (from Doug Ambrisko) that don't seem to have been committed (yet?). If he (or anyone else) would like me to test things, I'm willing and able. Cheers, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org To paraphrase David Hilbert, there can be no conflicts between the discipline of systems administration and Microsoft, since they have nothing in common. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210221422.g9MEMxwU006241>