Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:06:31 -0500 From: Lucas Holt <luke@foolishgames.com> To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG ORG" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PPC ver of freeBSD ? isent that the main body of os X Message-ID: <A00ABE86-574D-11D8-BF57-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com> In-Reply-To: <E839ECE3-5737-11D8-9813-003065A70D30@shire.net> References: <4020B667.8070809@sonic.net> <393AF58A-5727-11D8-B1AE-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com> <E839ECE3-5737-11D8-9813-003065A70D30@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> > > Not to be pedantic, but there is no such thing as OS X.3 . There is > OS X 10.3 . > > Thats what I get for following common conventions for developer lists! :) Many people use X.1, X.2, etc. to refer to versions of OS X. Technically you are right though. The one time i use it... Lucas Holt Luke@FoolishGames.com ________________________________________________________ FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging) 'Re-implementing what I designed in 1979 is not interesting to me personally. For kids who are 20 years younger than me, Linux is a great way to cut your teeth. It's a cultural phenomenon and a business phenomenon. Mac OS X is a rock-solid system that's beautifully designed. I much prefer it to Linux.' -- Bill Joy, Wired Article 2003
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A00ABE86-574D-11D8-BF57-000A95EFF4CA>