Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PASSERT() - asserting for panics
Message-ID:  <200809110006.m8B06vOU033199@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <200809101531.54646.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200809102126.m8ALQxdK032024@apollo.backplane.com> <200809101806.38042.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:I think part of the pollution is that what I really want to do is treat a 
:panic like an exception that I can catch.  I could probably make that idiom 
:work with two macros so your code can be:
:
:	PANIC_TRY {
:		/* do stuff */
:	} PANIC_CATCH("foo");
:
:That could potentially work with some evil goto's that jumped between the 
:macros (i.e. have the setjmp() in PANIC_CATCH and PANIC_TRY goto's down to 
:-- 
:John Baldwin

    Hmm.  Almost java-like, where an exception pops back through subroutine
    levels until it finds a match.  That kind of functionality would be a
    real mess in C.   A limited form would be possible, something like this:

    #define PANIC_CATCH(label)			\ (...)
	static jmpbuf label # _jmpbuf
	if (0) {
	    for (;;) {
		longjmp(&label # _jmpbuf);
		label:

    #define PANIC_RETRY		}}

    #define PANIC_PANIC		panic(...); }}

    #define PASSERT(label, cond)		\ (...)
	if (__predict_false(!(cond))) {	
		setjmp (&label # _jmpbuf);
		goto label;
	}

    PANIC_CATCH(badthings) {
	...
	PANIC_RETRY;
    }

    PANIC_CATCH(badthings) {
	...
	PANIC_PANIC;
    }

    PASSERT(badthings, x == 1);

    Which would allow you some control over the context plus allow multiple
    PASSERT's with the same label.  But, OMG I don't know about doing
    setjmp/longjmp in the kernel.  I don't think it would be worth it.

    Theoretically one could cross procedural boundaries with the longjmp,
    and place the jmpbuf in a DATASET and have the kernel glue the longjmp
    address.  That would be a candidate for the C obfuscation contest
    though.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809110006.m8B06vOU033199>