Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 09:11:14 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/eBones/usr.sbin/kerberos kerberos.c Message-ID: <199509170711.JAA16606@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Would I be correct in suggesting that for eBones, RELENG_2_1_0 and HEAD > >are being kept identical? > > For now yes, but I am curently testing a proposed fix for multi-homed > clients and that will not go into 2.1. I will be sending it around for > review before it goes into 2.2 as well. The patch below was a bug fix, > not new functionality, and I was able to make it fail before the patch > was aplied. So for my repository, if I make RELENG_2_1_0 the same as HEAD _now_, I shouldn't break anything for eBones and secure? > >Is the same happening for secure? > > So far, yes. I don't know of anything else planned for secure in the near > future though. ]:-> I will be bringing in the new DES library (hopefully today), and in the next few days I want to repair Secure RPC. M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grumble.grondar.za for PGP key
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509170711.JAA16606>